Which is NOT a compatible purpose for processing data beyond the purpose originally specified at the time of collection?

Which is NOT a compatible purpose for processing data beyond the purpose originally specified at the time of collection?

• A. Performance of a contract
• B. Transferring data to an archive
• C. Statistical purposes
• D. Historical or scientific research

Answer: (A)

The concept of "compatible purpose" in data processing refers to the practice of using personal data for purposes that align closely with the initial purpose for which it was collected. When assessing whether a new purpose is compatible, it generally involves looking at whether the new use could be reasonably expected by the data subjects at the time of collection. Performance of a contract, while a legitimate basis for processing data, does not qualify as a compatible purpose for further processing beyond the original purpose. This is because it implies a specific contractual obligation that was agreed upon, and any use of data for purposes outside that contract can create issues with trust and transparency. The focus is on fulfilling the exact requirements of the contract, rather than extending the data's use to new, potentially unrelated areas. On the other hand, purposes such as transferring data to an archive, conducting statistical analysis, or engaging in historical or scientific research can be considered compatible, assuming they align with the initial collection purpose and do not adversely affect the rights of the data subjects. These activities are generally accepted as extensions of use that still relate back to the original context of data collection.

The concept of "compatible purpose" in data processing refers to the practice of using personal data for purposes that align closely with the initial purpose for which it was collected. When assessing whether a new purpose is compatible, it generally involves looking at whether the new use could be reasonably expected by the data subjects at the time of collection.

Performance of a contract, while a legitimate basis for processing data, does not qualify as a compatible purpose for further processing beyond the original purpose. This is because it implies a specific contractual obligation that was agreed upon, and any use of data for purposes outside that contract can create issues with trust and transparency. The focus is on fulfilling the exact requirements of the contract, rather than extending the data's use to new, potentially unrelated areas.

On the other hand, purposes such as transferring data to an archive, conducting statistical analysis, or engaging in historical or scientific research can be considered compatible, assuming they align with the initial collection purpose and do not adversely affect the rights of the data subjects. These activities are generally accepted as extensions of use that still relate back to the original context of data collection.